Step 1:		Gather the evidence.
	A}	Get Your papers in order.
		1)	Original Loan documents from the closing.
		2)	All documents [certified copies] from the county recorder’s office 					pertaining to the property.  Make copies for the exams and evidence. 				(Get a notary to sign off on copies that they are copies of certified copies)
	B}	Make copies available to 2 forensic examiners.  [2 witnesses]
		1)	Have the loan documents examined.
		2)	Have everything regarding the foreclosure examined.						a)	Received in the mail. (Mail fraud)								b)	Documents recorded in the county recorder’s office						(recording false documents is a felony) 									[Documents: Assignment of mortgage/deed of trust; 						Substitution of trustee; Notice of trustee sale]
		3)	Have the SEC violations uncovered by the forensic examiners.
Step 2:		 Evidence the fraud with documentation.
	A}	Take evidence to the police to file charges.  Get copies of the report. 					(Its not fraud if you don’t report it, and by reporting it you reverse the 				presumption that the court must follow, now the court must act as 				though you are right and the banks are wrong.) 							(if they won’t file charges, get an “incident report number”)
	B}	Report the Notary to the Secretary of State’s Office to have the Notary’s seal 			revoked. (This will help other people the notary has screwed)
	C}	Take the fraudulent documents and evidence thereof to the County Atty and the 			State Atty offices and file charges against the Bank’s CEO for filing false 				documentation in a Public Office. (A felony in most states)
	D}	Take the fraudulent documents and evidence thereof to the FBI and report it 			there and get a copy of their report. 	(If they won’t file charges, get an “incident 			report number”)
	E}	Report the mailing of fraudulent documents in furtherance of extortion to the US 		Postmaster General. 
Step 3:		 File Your suit in the Superior court or U.S.D.C.
	A}	Use forensic examinations as evidence
	B}	Use “incident reports” and/or criminal reports as evidence
	C}	If you don’t know or can’t find the Statute number, just quote the crime. 				(It’s their job to look up the law and give the crime a number)
Note: Crimes anywhere in the US:
	18 U.S.C. §§ 371(Conspiracy), 1001, 1011, 1018, 1341- 1349(Mail fraud), 		1951(Hobbs Act), 1961-1968(Rico Act).
	Public Law Pub.L. 107-56: inter alia, Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing 	Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001: 		(The USA PATRIOT Act)
Note: Crimes in Arizona:
	Maricopa county recorder site  is   recorder.maricopa.gov
	A.R.S. §§ 39-161(Filing a false document in a public office), 13-2301 through 2312, 	33-420(Grounds for suit).
39-161. Presentment of false instrument for filing; classification
A person who acknowledges, certifies, notarizes, procures or offers to be filed, registered or recorded in a public office in this state an instrument he knows to be false or forged, which, if genuine, could be filed, registered or recorded under any law of this state or the United States, or in compliance with established procedure is guilty of a class 6 felony. As used in this section "instrument" includes a written instrument as defined in section 13-2001. 

33-420. False documents; liability; special action; damages; violation; classification
A. A person purporting to claim an interest in, or a lien or encumbrance against, real property, who causes a document asserting such claim to be recorded in the office of the county recorder, knowing or having reason to know that the document is forged, groundless, contains a material misstatement or false claim or is otherwise invalid is liable to the owner or beneficial title holder of the real property for the sum of not less than five thousand dollars, or for treble the actual damages caused by the recording, whichever is greater, and reasonable attorney fees and costs of the action.
B. The owner or beneficial title holder of the real property may bring an action pursuant to this section in the superior court in the county in which the real property is located for such relief as is required to immediately clear title to the real property as provided for in the rules of procedure for special actions. This special action may be brought based on the ground that the lien is forged, groundless, contains a material misstatement or false claim or is otherwise invalid. The owner or beneficial title holder may bring a separate special action to clear title to the real property or join such action with an action for damages as described in this section. In either case, the owner or beneficial title holder may recover reasonable attorney fees and costs of the action if he prevails.
C. A person who is named in a document which purports to create an interest in, or a lien or encumbrance against, real property and who knows that the document is forged, groundless, contains a material misstatement or false claim or is otherwise invalid shall be liable to the owner or title holder for the sum of not less than one thousand dollars, or for treble actual damages, whichever is greater, and reasonable attorney fees and costs as provided in this section, if he wilfully refuses to release or correct such document of record within twenty days from the date of a written request from the owner or beneficial title holder of the real property.
D. A document purporting to create an interest in, or a lien or encumbrance against, real property not authorized by statute, judgment or other specific legal authority is presumed to be groundless and invalid.
E. A person purporting to claim an interest in, or a lien or encumbrance against, real property, who causes a document asserting such claim to be recorded in the office of the county recorder, knowing or having reason to know that the document is forged, groundless, contains a material misstatement or false claim or is otherwise invalid is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor. 

Understand the reasoning:
	The court MUST act under the presumption the banks are doing EVERYTHING correctly. You MUST reverse this presumption. If you go to court claiming fraud but you have never reported the fraud, the presumption of the court stands uncorrected. You MUST report the fraud before going to court so the court presumes you are right and the banks are wrong. 
	Otherwise, it would be like a woman suing a man for rape two years ago but she never reported the rape to the police. 
	Study the true history of the Inquisition. What the banks are doing is just a repeat of that horror. Everything then as now was reliant on what the notaries claimed to be true even though it was all lies. 
	If you invalidate what the notaries filed then the bank MUST prove their claims, which they cannot. The fact you have not invalidated notarized documents in a public record means those notarized documents MUST be considered correct by the court, even if you invalidate them during the trial.        (See Rules of evidence)