Commonlaw Copyright © 2010 My Private Audio - All Rights Reserved
*Complaint Tort - New case to start the re-conveyance procedure

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE, THIS IS FOR EDUCATION ONLY, AND IS WHAT I MIGHT DO IF IN A CERTAIN SITUATION.

COMMON LAW COPYRIGHTED AND RELEASED BY THE AUTHOR INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.

The document is self-explanatory. It is designed to be used as a SEPARATE case even if suing a "lender" for a foreclosure issue. The premise is that if the Defendant cannot produce the docs in this case, he best not claim they can produce the docs in the other case. See: "perjury by inconsistent statements"

This doc is written for Arizona, but the first 2 causes are UCC and convert from ARS 47-9207. 47-9210 to UCC 9-207 and 9-210 respectively.

As always with my writings, this document is blessed and cursed. It MAY only be given freely and used by decent people. Those will be blessed. Anyone using my documents for MONEY or the like, or with evil intent are hereby CURSED.

Don't be stupid enough to think the blessing and curse aren't real. It is a lesson you do not want to learn.

I do this for my Father. He's serious about this stuff.
   

John C; of the family Stuart, sui juris
Agent for JOHN STUART, habenae cpartum fingo
The Ecclesiastical Order of : Mobius Nemesis

Notes from Audio of 4/8/10

No. I dont understand, judge.

Please have them stipulate as to whether or not they are the creditor.

I claim they are ficticious Payees

Its a currency exchange

They took my signed note, and exchanged it, then sold the note "without recourse which discharges the obligation according to the UCC.

They never gave me the proceeds of the loan.

They can never capture jurisdiction unless you grant it to them

RE: Property Taxes" Unincorporated means it is not under the constitution. It's a corporate document/commercial offer. Contract law. Counter offer. Blue line thru everything you do
not agree with. Sign without prejudice, all rights reserved.

Update: 5/19/2010
Note: Items that should be added

We need to say something about the note being stamped "Without Recourse"

A copy of the note certified within 72 hours of the copy

When the bank gets the note in house they stamp it "without recourse", look up "Without Recourse".  It is now a note that cannot be used for a foreclosure, it also does not need to be paid on, IT IS WITHOUT RECOURSE.

QWR etc. RESPONSE MUST BE SENT SIGNED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY.
see UCC 3-308

Did You stamp the note without recourse?
Yes.  Then how can You have recourse on Me for that document?
No.    Then why do You not send the fractionalized

Are You the Holder In Due Course?

Are You the Creditor?

return to top
Click here
Mail your postal
post card to
John Stuart
201 S. 4th S. Ave
Phx, AZ 85003
T008067
Mock Court Transcripts
July 4th 2010
May 23rd 2010
June 2010 | Nuclear Option and
10 Judicial Notices Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  § 4
10 Judicial Notices Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  § 4


1 Plaintiff’s use of A.R.S. Title 47 shall be construed by this
  Court as Plaintiff also listing the corresponding U.C.C. Title.

2 DEFENDANT’S CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES ARE HISTORICALLY CONSIDERED
         “ACTS OF TERRORISM” AS EVIDENCED BY THE ARREST OF NUMEROUS
         OTHER SUBVERSIVE AND RADICAL POLITICAL GROUPS THAT
         OBFUSCATE LAWS TO STEAL LAND.   

3 U.C.C. § 3-604. DISCHARGE BY CANCELLATION OR RENUNCIATION.

4 PLAINTIFF REFUSES TO PARTICIPATE IN DEFENDANTS’ FRUADLENT AND/OR CRIMINAL
          AND/OR TERRORIST ACTIVITIES:

5 DUE PROCESS OF LAW IS PURSUANT TO MAXIMS OF LAW.

6 DEFENDANT AND/OR DEFENDANTS CANNOT HAVE ALL THREE (3).

7 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE FOUR SECTION, THIS
          COURT MUST ADHERE TO THE DECISION IN THE UTAH COURTS BARRING BANK OF
          AMERICA FROM FORECLOSING.

8 DEFENDANTS HAVE FAILED TO REBUT AND/OR DENY:

9 Defendants’ attorneys have previously and are currently violating numerous
          Canons of Ethics.

10       This action arises out of fraudulent misrepresentations and omissions that
           Defendants, jointly and/or separately, made, in whole or in part, in Maricopa
           County, Arizona; as evidenced by the numerous forged, fraudulent and/or
           false documents Defendants, jointly and/or separately, filed and/or recorded
           and/or caused to be filed and/or recorded the Maricopa County Recorder’s
           Office, a felony under Arizona Law.
THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE, THIS IS FOR EDUCATION ONLY, AND IS WHAT I MIGHT DO IF IN A CERTAIN SITUATION.
COMMON LAW COPYRIGHTED AND RELEASED BY THE AUTHOR INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.
Resources & Referrals
Click here
Ask John Your Questions
John Stuart
Conference Call
Every Sunday
5PM pst 8PM est on
Show Me The Loan Talkshoe
Call DI 89902
STOP Preditory Lenders
THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE, THIS IS FOR EDUCATION ONLY, AND IS WHAT I MIGHT DO IF IN A CERTAIN SITUATION.

COMMON LAW COPYRIGHTED AND RELEASED BY THE AUTHOR INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.

As always with my writings, this document is blessed and cursed.
It MAY only be given freely and used by decent people. Those will be blessed. Anyone using my documents for MONEY or the like, or with evil intent are hereby CURSED.

Don't be stupid enough to think the blessing and curse aren't real.
It is a lesson you do not want to learn.

I do this for my Father. He's serious about this stuff.
   

John C; of the family Stuart, sui juris
Agent for JOHN STUART, habenae cpartum fingo
The Ecclesiastical Order of : Mobius Nemesis

Older Information No Longer Used
Show me the loan!
A legal doctrine developed by: John Chester; of the family Stuart
WEISBAND
(All docs for this case are in Pdf format)
TILA Statute of Limitations + No Limit = FORENSIC AUDIT
Click here
I keep getting asked the
same questions
click here
SHOW ME THE LOAN
SEMINAR WORK BOOK
COVER
BODY CONTENT
LAST PAGE DIAGRAM
"I don't understand how the bank with the assistance of the court can divest me of my property through the banks criminal acts of filing fraudulent documents" ~John Stuart
DISCLAIMER
1. We are not attorneys. We are homeowners helping each other.
2. We do not give advice. We share information.
3. We do not accept payment. We do accept donations.
4. We are not a business that tries to make money of people suffering. We are just of group of people refusing to be victims of the banks and an out of control court system.
5. We do not guarantee results. We do get results.
6. We do not condone violence. We believe in passive resistance to fraud.
7. We do not file false or forged documents in any public office. We do inform the appropriate agencies of false and forged documents filed by banks.
8. We do not do the work for people. We teach people how to do their own work. 9. We are not slaves. We are civilians. 10. We do not UNDERSTAND how banks can commit numerous felonious acts against the states to deprive civilians of their real property and property rights without due process of law. We know what the law requires the banks to do in order to non-judicially foreclose on our real property.
11. We do not believe judges should be advocates for the banks. We know that judges are required to be arbitrators of the case.
12. We are not here to get rich. We are here to give help.
13. We are not "carpetbaggers." We know what the definition of "carpetbaggers" is.
14. We do not use any of the "patriot mythologies" to get a home for free. We do use the law to prevent banks from getting our home for free and depriving us of our rights.
15. We are not a religion, a church, a vigilante group, a separatist group, a cult, conspiracy theorists, or any type of anti-government establishment. We are the TRUE owners of real property attempting to prevent the unlawful seizing of our real property by parties with fraudulent legal claims, in accordance with Keech v. Stanford (1726) and Carpenter v. Longan (1872).
16. We do not love things and own people. We love people and own things.

No wonder the judges and cops will break any law to help the banks CLICK HERE
Please, everyone, send at least $20 to save Shannon, I need him back to help with our fight.
Sue Connely
4025 East Chandler Blvd. #70-E13
Phoenix, Arizona 85048
A trick for credit card cases from one of our group:

Subpoena Duces Tecum the contract and all accounting between the debt collector (the attorney suing you that is acting as though they are representing the bank) and the bank. This would prove they are a debt collector and not counsel for the bank. This has been known to scare them off completeley. They will either run or fight the Subpoena. If they fight then you can do an affidavit stating you believe they are just a debt collector to push the issue.

– J.P. Morgan circa 1913: “Capital must protect itself in every way... Debts must be collected and loans and mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible. When through a process of law the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law applied by the central power of leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. This is well known among our principle men now engaged in forming an imperialism of capitalism to govern the world. By dividing the people we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us except as teachers of the common herd.
CALIFORNIA CODES

A.R.S. §§ 39-161 = CA. PNL. C. §115 (a)
A.R.S. § 33-420 = CA. GOV. C. §12650
A.R.S. § 47-9527 = CA. B&P C. §17500
A.R.S. § 13-2301 = 18 U.S.C. §891
A.R.S. § 33-801 = CA.CIV.C.  §2920 – 2923
A.R.S. § 33-807(B) = CA.CIV.C.§ 2924g
A.R.S. § 33-807(A) = CA.CIV.C.§2924
A.R.S. § 47-3302 = CA.COM.C. §3302
A.R.S. §§ 47-2711(2)(b) = CA.COM.C. §2711 (2) (b)
A.R.S. §§ 2716(3) = CA.COM.C. §2716 (3)
A.R.S. § 47-3501 = CA.COM.C. §3501
A,R.S. Title 47 (Arizona uses uppercase letters in subparts) = California Commercial Code (California uses lower case letters in subparts)

Hi John,

This is the case that came down this week where the Arizona District Court REMANDED a case back to State Court based on their Abstention to rule on the case because it presented First Impression issues, which the Federal Court wanted the Arizona Courts to rule on and provide guidance to the Federal Court as to the State Courts' position on these new issues.

The Plaintiff is an Attorney here in Scottsdale whom I met, and who is acting Pro Per.
I have included her Complaint , her Motion to remand and Reply in Support, and the Court Order which is a MUST READ,

Please Note that the Complaint at pages 8-9, 23-24, and 27-30 addresses the failure of the first Substitute Trustee's failure to resign as Substitute Trustee before the appointment of a new Substitute Trustee.
The Court's Order is very well thought out, and this Ruling is HUGE, I think.
This is a case worth following.

Anita

NEW
NOTARY COMPLAINT
Read My picks of John's email
The people profiting from the private prisons are in charge of who gets imprisoned.~John Stuart  | Check it out here and | here
Contribute to The Cause
click here
July 1, 2012
April 1, 2012
QUIET TITLE ACTION WEBINAR Q&A
DEFINITIONS
Elena discovered I forgot the jurisdiction concept of the tender and grant deed / quit claim deed. I added that and corrected a typo. Then I added a bunch more stuff in blue. It just keeps getting better. Remember to add all the docs as exhibits. If anyone else finds any thing let me know.  I want this to be the QT that everyone can use in every state. You should add what ever you discover about notary fraud, IRS - 3949A stuff etc.
John Stuart
Breaking News!
You can only send in standard postcards which you can pick up at your local post office. You can only write in blue or black ink. Once again the address is:

John Stuart
201 S. 4th S. Ave
Phx, AZ 85003
T008067


click here